This is a big topic I am now in love with. I'll try to expound on it here, over time.
in 3d we can have a special sort of "duality",
A = *dA
(sometimes called a topological chern-simons
mass (in units where the mass is 1) since it
comes from the lagrangian
L = dA/\*dA + A/\dA
Now, I've been trying to interpret this using
some geometrical pictures, and they seem to
imply very strange things. Here we go:
let's consider a "Wilson probe" , the integral
of A along some curve C :
W = I[C] { A }
to establish notation, I use stokes, with C = b S
( 'b' means bdry of ), so
W = I[S] { dA }
Instead, I could have used duality :
W = I[C] { *dA }
Now, I use the fact that "*" in 3-d turns a vector into
the plane perpindicular to it, and vice-a-versa (to what
extent this is more than intuitive, I cannot say), so
let
F = family of surfaces, each satisfying *F = C
(a foliation of perpendicular surfaces
along the path C)
then:
W = I[F] { dA }
Now we can use Stokes : bF = C' :
W = I[C'] { A }
Compare to where we started :
W = I[C] { A }
This is a purely topological equivalence between the curves
C and C' - which are, however, non-trivially different.
C' is the boundary of the family of surfaces perp. to C ;
by drawing a little picture it is easy to see that C' is a
helix which spirals around C (very tight, and infinitesimally
close).
So, it seems the "duality" condition means that any Wilson
probe is equivalent to a thickened or framed Wilson probe.
Of course, we can apply this "duality thickening" recursively,
C' -> C'' -> C''' -> C''''
Each time, the curve is replaced by the helix which wraps around
that curve. (this is reminiscent of DNA hyper-coiling) So,
apparently C'''''''(infinity) = Ci is become fractally-thick !
that is, the space becomes so full of coilings, that Ci becomes
a solid object!
if C is ~ S1 (reads homotopic)
then Ci is S1 x S1 = T2 !
duality has replaces the circle by the torus !
(more precisly, if S1(r) is a circle of radius roughly r, then
Ci = S1(r) x S1(epsilon) = T2(r,eps)
is a "barely" thickened torus covering C.
Have I done this right? Can it be made more precise?
(in particular, the step of replacing C by F was not rigorous)
Charles Bloom / cb at my domain Send Me Email
The free web counter says you are visitor number